COMMITTEES

International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA

GROUP: GENERAL ASSEMBLY

usg.ga@munuc.org

  • Topic A: Ending Nuclear Proliferation
  • Topic B: Addressing the Consequences of Nuclear Testing

TOPIC A Ending Nuclear Proliferation

TOPIC B Addressing the Consequences of Nuclear Testing

DELEGATION SIZE Double

EXECUTIVES

  • Andrew Joel (he/him)
  • Clara Aguilar (she/her)
  • Nico Stefanov (he/him)
Email Committee Chair

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is an independent organization composed of 173 member states dedicated to international cooperation on matters of nuclear energy and weapons. Despite answering to the United Nations Security Council and General Assembly, the IAEA is an autonomous organization chartered by an independent international statute. Guided by a mission to expand the peaceful and safe use of nuclear technology, the IAEA provides a platform for nearly every member state of the U.N. to voice their concerns regarding nuclear technology.

TOPIC A: Ending Nuclear Proliferation
The spread of nuclear weapon ownership remains one of the most severe threats to global peace and security. Their existence enables the potential for irreversible humanitarian catastrophe, even at a limited scale. The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) established a framework to pursue disarmament and prevent others from procuring such weapons, but its effectiveness has been repeatedly undermined by states withdrawing from its provisions, a lack of formal enforcement, and a denuclearization process that is far too slow for substantial change. Geopolitical tensions further complicate the issue, with nations in volatile regions citing concerns of safety when pursuing nuclear deterrence; so long as some states maintain nuclear arsenals, others will continue to strive to acquire their own capabilities for precautionary protection. At the end of the day, it is civilians who suffer the consequences of nuclear competition. In order to strengthen efforts for nuclear disarmament, international, collaborative action is needed to close existing loopholes, strengthen enforcement mechanisms, and address the underlying security concerns that drive states to seek nuclear capabilities in the first place.

TOPIC B: Addressing the Consequences of Nuclear Testing
Decades of nuclear weapons testing have left devastation that international agencies have yet to fully address. Communities that lacked the political power to refuse testing on their lands are affected most severely by the legacy of past testing, and they continue to face disproportionately high rates of health complications as a direct result of unsolicited radioactive exposure. Testing sites suffer from persisting environmental contamination, with polluted soil and water that render land and ecosystems severely damaged and often unusable. These consequences will remain for generations without deliberate work toward rehabilitation. While efforts against future testing have strengthened in recent decades, they do not address the harm that has already been inflicted. International cooperation is needed to explore mechanisms for environmental decontamination, healthcare, and compensation for affected communities, while also considering how nations can build stronger structures to prevent the unchecked consequences of nuclear programs.